Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Game as Old as Empire
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No prejudice towards redirection. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:34, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- A Game as Old as Empire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to fail general notability criteria as well as the specific notability criteria for books. No evidence of substantial, non-trivial coverage in independent, reliable sources. MastCell Talk 22:24, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; seems to have both neutrality and notability problems. bobrayner (talk) 22:58, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:21, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:21, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Fails WP:GNG as well as WP:BK.--JayJasper (talk) 19:03, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to author's article. At more than 600 hits last month, it qualifies for at least a redirect to be established immediately subsequent to deletion. --85.197.3.207 (talk) 02:39, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 17:49, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- delete per nom. No evidence of meeting notability and hit counts less than useless for establishing the notability of a redirect. Sailsbystars (talk) 01:35, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- What exactly is "notability of a redirect" supposed to mean? We create redirects wherever they are useful. There is nothing in our notability guidelines on if, when and how a topic would be notable enough for a redirect. --85.197.4.56 (talk) 00:04, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Confessions of an Economic Hit Man, the notable book to which it is a sequel. The content could also be appropriately merged to the author's page. But deletion would be inappropriate. Candleabracadabra (talk) 02:55, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.